Post #264: America’s Tiananmen?

“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross.”–Sinclair Lewis

Yesterday, June 4, is usually best remembered for the 1989 suppression in Beijing of pro-democracy demonstrators who had gathered, and occupied, the square at Tiananmen. Less well remembered is that senior retired commanders of the People’s Liberation Army protested against deployment of the military against China’s citizens. The communist party leadership under Deng Xiaoping acted anyway, and thousands of people were killed in the name of “stability and order.”

Now June 4 may also be remembered as the day the American people, in peaceful protest, also confronted the US military, called out by an autocratic president desperate to show toughness under fire. Here, too, as at Tiananmen, several (there may be more*) retired senior military leaders have come out against this president, sharply criticizing his use of the military for partisan political purposes. Former defense secretary and general James Mattis said: “We must reject any thinking of our cities as a ‘battle space’ that our uniformed military is called upon to ‘dominate.’” But Mattis went further, indicting Trump’s entire tenure: “Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead, he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort” (

The New York Times reports today (June 5): “One general officer, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid punishment from his superiors, said on Thursday that he was hoping to make it through another day without having to cite his constitutional obligations to decline an illegal order. He said he would not be surprised if he faced such a dilemma in the coming weeks.” Indeed; US military leaders seem more and more likely to have to deal with orders from a president who is truly out of control as he seeks to hold on to power.

The scene playing out in Washington, DC must not be a preview of November, when a Trump defeat at the polls might lead him to call upon the military to “preserve order” following a “rigged” election. Has our country reached the point where those of us who treasure democracy, the Constitution, and the rule of law must pin our hopes on the military’s allegiance to our Constitution above the commander-in-chief’s unconstitutional orders?
*A few days later, 89 former defense officials published a statement that said: “We are alarmed at how the president is betraying this oath by threatening to order members of the U.S. military to violate the rights of their fellow Americans” (

Categories: Tags: , , , , , ,


  1. Yes I’m afraid it may come to that this fall….I do not often express fear,but here we are….I really don’t know what sort of discussions in which to join… I am VERY disappointed in my Democratic party . The best we could come up with is BIDEN?? We now have the choice of voting for a rich,demented,racist,sexist vagina grabbing jerk or a rich,demented,racist,sexist vagina grabbing jerk.. The whole field stank.. Being raised by Social Democrats I can tell you Bernie is NOT one.. Hell-he’s not even a SOCIABLE Democrat. guess I’m about at a loss for words….. Take care, Eric

  2. Dear Mel:

    I remind you, of course, that in these matters, every soldier swears an oath to the Constitution, not a person; and that she/he is obligated by the Uniform Code of Military Justice to obey any LEGAL order. Notorious examples of the exceptions to such “legal orders” throughout our military history abound: from slavery (Robert E. Lee, “Stonewall” Jackson, and others’); suppression of First Citizens (Native Americans); examples being William Sherman and George Custer; Herbert Hoover’s suppression of the Bonus Workers’ encampment in Washington, D.C. at the beginning of the Great Depression; etc.

    The matter of “cold comfort” notwithstanding; we can take some comfort, with reservations, of our military: it’s not for nothin’ that the military, among other professions, is the most highly regarded at this time.

  3. Mel and fellow readers,
    The pen can be mightier than the sword, especially in times like these and especially when used to inspire people to speak out. Your pen keeps pressure on our leaders, but also keeps pressure on all of us to take action.

    In the face of egregious acts, silence is never appropriate, it only emboldens those who would promote hate and discord. We need to always support bravery and to look inward to ourselves. Brave acts like those of the Chinese generals speaking out against Tiananmen Square actions don’t always produce the effects we hope for, but without such acts we are guaranteed to suffer the consequences of silence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s