Post #236: Iran—Who and Where is the Threat?

The official US narrative on Iran is that it is an escalating threat to “peace and security” in the Middle East and must be stopped. Step by step, with Mike Pompeo and John Bolton—two war maniacs—taking the lead, the Trump administration has sought to destabilize Iran with sanctions, if possible bring about regime change, and if necessary provoke actions by Iran that will provide a pretext for war. If this sounds similar to the nonexistent Gulf of Tonkin “incident” in 1964 and the false pretenses behind the post-9/11 invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, it should be. Only this time around is even more dangerous and more preposterous.

Journalists and Congress members have been pestering Trump and his aides with questions about their determination to go to war with Iran. Trump, typically, tells reporters to wait and see, stymieing them. They should be asking different questions, such as: What threat does Iran pose to US interests? Why shouldn’t Iran’s actions be considered responses to the US policy of “maximum pressure”? The answers to these two questions are clear: Iran is doing nothing that constitutes a new threat to US or any other country’s interests, and Iran’s latest actions—even if Tehran is responsible for the attacks on oil tankers in the Gulf and the downing of a US drone—are best understood as responses to US provocations.

What I believe we are now witnessing is the result of the ascendance of the hardliners on both sides. US policy since the appointments of Pomeo and Bolton and withdrawal from the nuclear deal has energized their counterparts in Iran—the Revolutionary Guards, certain military leaders, and others long opposed to the nuclear deal and now able to show that the Americans are completely untrustworthy.

The fact is that the Trump administration has been on a mission from Day One, with open support from Israel and Saudi Arabia, to eliminate—not merely deter or contain—the ayatollah’s government. That mission has engaged US administrations since the early 1950s, but unlike those previous efforts, Trump seems prepared to commit US forces to accomplish regime change. Yes, he has said he wants to avoid war, especially with a reelection campaign underway. That is why his preference is not to deploy yet another war-fighting force to the Middle East, which would undermine his longstanding criticism of “endless wars” there. But preference is not policy, and the policy, being relentlessly pushed by Bolton and Pompeo, is to push Iran’s regime to the brink and get rid of it.

If Trump takes the US to war with Iran—and, let’s face it, he has been waging economic warfare for some time—it would probably happen without consultation or authorization from Congress (another impeachable offense). The responsibility for this war will be squarely on his head.* Thanks to the Obama administration, Iran has been in compliance with the nuclear deal, an achievement that is very much in the security interests of the US and its Middle East allies. He showed that moving from confrontation to engagement pays off, and that mutual respect can move mountains even when trust is absent. Now, however, the enemies of “peace and security” are in Washington, Tel Aviv, and Riyadh. And among the most outrageous aspects of Trump’s Middle East policy is rewarding those enemies—Israel, with a full tilt to Benjamin Netanyahu’s assault on the Palestinians, complete with a dead-on-arrival “peace plan”; and Saudi Arabia, with billions of dollars in military aid so that the murderous crown prince, Mohammad bin Salman, can continue his aggression in Yemen.

I will say again: Donald Trump and his minions are the chief threats to America’s—and for that matter, the world’s—real security.

*The New York Times reports June 21 that Trump had decided to strike Iran over the drone incident but withdrew the order, supposedly because of the predicted casualties but more likely because it would be an act of war. The report, confirmed by Trump, means that once again he, like previous presidents, is prepared to use “retaliation” as an excuse for using force without proof of a threat or Congressional consent.

Categories: Tags: , , , , , , ,


  1. As usual, Right On, Mel. This piece needs to be mainstream, prime time. Will Congress act to regain its power to say no or yes to war? At least Trump pulled back from the brink,,,, this time. Bolton and Pompeo must go! Thanks, Mel.

  2. Dear Mel:

    What can we do? Like you, I live in Oregon (with a nod to Pete and Anne from Canberra). That is very helpful, because both our Senators are unalterably opposed to The Donald; and our Representative, Peter DeFazio is as well.

    I think Community Alliance of Lane County will hold a demonstration in front of the “new” Federal courthouse. For those unaware (including you, Mel); CALC was originally named Clergy And Laity Concerned; and before that (and its reputation was national) Clergy And Laity Concerned About Vietnam; and included one Dr. Martin Luther King on its advisory board.

    But “demonstrations” only go so far, especially to one as indifferent as Donald Trump! I refuse to act in any violent way; but it’s tempting. Perhaps violence to property…

  3. Gu, Your blog came out just a moment too early.

    I am waiting for Dunford or someone else in the Military to say: “Are you kidding? We begged and pleaded with Trump to pay attention to what we had been saying about the results, on the ground. But he was far too busy watching quiz shows on Fox and jacking off to listen to our advice.”

    If the Military doesn’t initiate a response and doesn’t say something like that, Trump will blame them and they will be seen as being every bit as trigger happy as Trump (and probably his military hero, Curtis Lemay). I don’t think the Military can accept that characterization.

    Could it be that Trump has finally made his fatal miscalculation? Forced the military to take him on and put a real scare in the people now playing bingo or riding their Harleys who have not been paying any more attention to reality than the Donald? Let’s hope so.


    1. Isn’t it something? We, the Vietnam generation, look to the military, FBI, and CIA to save us from Desperate Donald. Even a coup might be welcome in many liberal quarters at this point.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s