The Lies Never Stop
On February 18, Presidents Trump and Zelensky spoke by phone following US-Russia talks in Saudi Arabia that aim at ending the war in Ukraine. Their conversation boils down to this: Trump offered his usual mix of lies and outrageous demands, and Zelensky politely and indirectly suggested that Trump was selling Ukraine out.
“I would like to have more truth with the Trump team,” said Zelensky, who, rather than criticize Trump directly, excused him for being “caught in a web of [Russian] disinformation.” Zelensky rightly is accusing Trump of parroting the Russian line on the war, and thus making the US untrustworthy. Trump said Ukraine “started” the war, that it should have ended the war three years ago, and that he would have ended it had he been in power. All nonsense, but music to Putin’s ears. Indeed, Putin is publicly thanking the Americans for finally not blaming Russia and wanting to look ahead. (But wait: Trump has amended his statement with another lie, saying on Fox Radio: “Russia attacked, but they [Biden and Zelensky] shouldn’t have let him attack.”
Further in line with Russian talking points, Trump criticized Zelensky’s leadership directly. “Think of it, a modestly successful comedian, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, talked the United States of America into spending $350 Billion Dollars, to go into a War that couldn’t be won, that never had to start, but a War that he, without the U.S. and “TRUMP,” will never be able to settle.” Trump called Zelensky a “Dictator without Elections [who] better move fast or he’s not going to have a country left.” I guess Putin doesn’t qualify as a dictator without elections. Keir Starmer, Britain’s PM, had a response: “The prime minister expressed his support for President Zelenskyy as Ukraine’s democratically elected leader and said that it was perfectly reasonable to suspend elections during war time as the UK did during World War II,” a spokesperson said.
Trump’s Game
But truth doesn’t matter when you have near-absolute power. Trump is determined to end the war, cutting costs, promoting business opportunities in Russia, drastically reducing the US role in NATO, and enabling him to focus on China. Ukraine means nothing to him, whereas cozying up to white Christian nationalists like Putin means everything to Trump and his minions as they seek to redraw the map of Europe. Zelensky is bargaining from weakness: He’s excluded from the US-Russia talks, he knows he can’t rely entirely on Europe for security, and he also knows that Ukraine will have to sacrifice territory in a settlement with Russia.
Worse yet for Ukraine, Trump has made further US aid conditional on Ukraine’s agreement to a one-sided selloff of its mineral and oil wealth. Trump is demanding $500 billion worth of Ukraine’s resources—more than four times the $119 billion in actual US aid to Ukraine, according to a research organization in Germany, the Kiel Institute. It’s a disgraceful arrangement that would essentially make Ukraine a US colony—as though Ukraine is the aggressor and must pay reparations. The proposed deal provides no protection from Russia, which would not have to pay a dime for what it has done to Ukraine’s people and resources. And it’s sign or else, says Trump: “We’re going to either sign a deal, or there’s going to be a lot of problems with them.”
Ukraine’s Resilience
There is another, completely different side to this war’s next stage that is rarely discussed—one in which Ukraine, following on Zelensky’s warning, rejects a US-Russia deal and fights on. (An exception is Max Boot’s article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/02/23/ukraine-russia-trump-europe/). Ukraine would encounter mounting logistical problems over time, but it has the capability to withstand Russia’s assault for another year or more. Writing in the current issue of Foreign Affairs, Natalyia Gumenyuk, a Ukrainian journalist, cites strong Ukrainian support for no deal rather than a bad deal. She emphasizes the country’s resilience:
Despite intense pressure on civilian areas, Ukraine has managed to preserve and even rebuild a degree of normalcy in everyday life. Following the economic shock of the initial invasion, Western budgetary support, which now makes up 20 percent of Ukraine’s GDP, has allowed the economy to grow by an average of 4.4 percent over the past two years; there has been real household income growth, and inflation remains fairly low. Since the middle of 2023, when Ukrainian drones had effectively neutralized Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, maritime routes have been open again, with Ukrainian exports up by 15 percent over the past year. And according to the government in Kyiv, some 40 percent of the weapons Ukraine is using on the frontlines are now produced domestically, compared with hardly any in 2022. None of these changes take away from the extraordinary hardships of war, but they have helped give Ukrainian society a kind of adaptability and endurance that may not be fully visible to outsiders. (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/putins-ukraine)
And if the war goes on, Russia would not have a free ride. It would continue paying a heavy price in lives and its economy.
Let’s remember this about Ukraine: It’s their country, it is the victim of an aggressive war, and it has fought courageously to preserve its independence. Ukraine deserves better than to be cast aside so that Trump can serve his own narrow and seditious ambitions.
In the Human Interest - Mel Gurtov 
Dear Mel:
In short, elections matter. I am not surprised that many of the voters who voted for Trump are wondering :”What the f#^k, I didn’t vote for this!”
We, Jan and I, have flown the Ukrainian flag from the get-go.
Mike Peterson
Thank you for your clear and accurate analysis. Trump’s lie that Ukraine started the war is a new low point and will be remembered as a disgraceful betrayal of democracy and American national interests.
Fact, most politicians lie, sadly, some lie more than others. Regarding the Ukraine, one has to ask, why weren’t they asked to join the EU and or NATO years ago?
Based on public available information, the answer is corruption in the halls of power, remember the links to Biden’s son? Add to this a number of dubious actions of both past and present Ukrainian governments.
One would have to wonder whether Joe Biden’s support of the Ukraine was in any way influenced by his son’s possible involvement with the Ukraine?
Trump is correct, this Ukraine v Russian war could have and should have been avoided.
Hi Jon. I don’t agree with your assessment. In the first place, recall that in 2010, under Ukraine’s pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych,Ukraine agreed to become a nonaligned state. That ended pursuit of NATO membership. But in 2013, he sought to defy the large public protests in Kyev in favor of EU membership and was overthrown (he fled to Moscow). Though Ukraine remains an applicant for EU membership, Putin was sufficiently unnerved to occupy Crimea. NATO membership was NOT an issue then, and had not been for some time. But Russia’s occupation of Crimea, and then large portions of the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, resurrected the NATO issue. As for Trump, his comment about the war being “avoided” is nonsense, born of his usual ignorance of history. The war could have been avoided had Putin lost his appetite for restoring the Russian empire and reducing Ukraine to a puppet state. Recall that Putin does not regard Ukraine as a legitimate country, let alone an independent one.
Thanks for your detailed and unbiased analysis…
Much appreciated, thank you.